On October 25, 2010 The American Theatre Wing Presented the first National Theatre Company Grants to ten regional theatre companies including: 1812 Productions (Philadelphia, PA) About Face Theatre (Chicago, IL) Boise Contemporary Theater (Boise, ID) Company One (Boston, MA) Curious Theatre Company Denver, CO) The Flea Theatre (New York, NY) Profile Theatre (Portland, OR) Synetic Theater (Arlington, VA) Silk Road Theatre Project (Chicago, IL) Triad Stage (Greensboro, NC)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XIzn_qkBS8&hl=en
National Grants Conferences - Nationwide Research and Educational Organization and Clearing House of Government Programs Information
Monday, April 25, 2011
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Being a Leader
Leadership Exposed: Issues You Believed You Knew About Leadership
Very much has been written about leadership: rules, pointers, designs, and biographies of inspiring leaders during planet historical past. But there are selected leadership suggestions that we ourselves fail to recognize and comprehend in the course of studying publications. Here is a brief record of factors you believed you knew about leadership.
one. Leaders come in various flavors.
There are diverse types of leaders and you will probably experience much more than a single kind in your lifetime. Formal leaders are these we elect into positions or offices these kinds of as the senators, congressmen, and presidents of the neighborhood clubs. Casual leaders or these we seem up to by virtue of their wisdom and knowledge this kind of as in the situation of the elders of a tribe, or our grandparents; or by virtue of their expertise and contribution on a provided subject such as Albert Einstein in the area of Theoretical Physics and Leonardo da Vinci in the discipline of the Arts. Both formal and casual leaders practice a blend of leadership designs.
· Lewin's 3 basic leadership kinds - authoritative, participative, and delegative
· Likert's four leadership types - exploitive authoritative, benevolent authoritative, consultative, and participative
· Goleman's six emotional leadership types - visionary, coaching, affiliative, democratic, pacesetting, and commanding.
2. Leadership is a approach of turning out to be.
Though sure people today seem to be born with innate leadership characteristics, devoid of the correct surroundings and exposure, they could fail to cultivate their complete likely. So like studying how to experience a bicycle, you can also understand how to become a chief and hone your leadership capabilities. Information on leadership theories and knowledge could be formally gained by enrolling in leadership seminars, workshops, and conferences. Daily interactions with people present the prospect to observe and practice leadership theories. Collectively, formal and casual studying will assist you get leadership attitudes, acquire leadership insights, and therefore furthering the cycle of studying. You do not grow to be a leader in one particular day and just discontinue. Lifestyle-lengthy finding out is essential in turning out to be a great leader for every day brings new experiences that place your expertise, skills, and attitude to a test.
3. Leadership commences with you.
The finest way to create leadership qualities is to use it to your own existence. As an adage goes "motion speaks louder than words." Leaders are always in the limelight. Retain in head that your credibility as a chief depends much on your steps: your interaction with your family members, good friends, and co-employees; your way of managing your personalized and organizational obligations; and even the way you talk with the newspaper vendor throughout the street. Repeated steps grow to be routines. Behavior in turn type a person's character. Steven Covey's book entitled 7 Behavior of Extremely Effective Men and women offers great insights on how you can achieve personal leadership.
four. Leadership is shared.
Leadership is not the sole obligation of 1 particular person, but somewhat a shared responsibility amongst members of an emerging crew. A leader belongs to a group. Every member has responsibilities to fulfill. Formal leadership positions are just extra duties aside from their responsibilities as members of the staff. Efficient leadership calls for members to do their share of function. Commencing as a mere group of folks, members and leaders work towards the formation of an successful staff. In this light, social interaction plays a significant role in leadership. To find out how to perform collectively demands a excellent offer of believe in involving and among leaders and members of an emerging group. Trust is constructed upon actions and not just on words. When mutual respect exists, believe in is fostered and confidence is created.
5. Leadership types depend on the scenario.
How arrive dictatorship functions for Singapore but not in the United States of America? Aside from tradition, beliefs, value method, and form of authorities, the present scenario of a nation also affects the leadership kinds utilized by its formal leaders. There is no rule that only 1 style can be applied. Most of the time, leaders use a blend of leadership styles depending on the circumstances. In emergency scenarios these kinds of as periods of war and calamity, selection-generating is a make a difference of life and demise. Thus, a nation's chief can't pay for to talk to with all departments to arrive at critical decisions. The case is of course diverse in periods of peace and order---various sectors and other branches of government can freely interact and take part in governance. A different situation in stage is in leading organizations. When the staffs are hugely motivated and capable, a mixture of large delegative and reasonable participative designs of leadership is most acceptable. But if the staffs have minimal competence and minimal commitment, a mix of higher coaching, higher supporting, and higher directing conduct from organizational leaders is necessary.
Now that you are reminded of these items, retain in thoughts that there are always tips that we feel we currently know; ideas we take for granted, but are truly the most beneficial insights on leadership.
barrington screen printing
blank apparel chicago
Very much has been written about leadership: rules, pointers, designs, and biographies of inspiring leaders during planet historical past. But there are selected leadership suggestions that we ourselves fail to recognize and comprehend in the course of studying publications. Here is a brief record of factors you believed you knew about leadership.
one. Leaders come in various flavors.
There are diverse types of leaders and you will probably experience much more than a single kind in your lifetime. Formal leaders are these we elect into positions or offices these kinds of as the senators, congressmen, and presidents of the neighborhood clubs. Casual leaders or these we seem up to by virtue of their wisdom and knowledge this kind of as in the situation of the elders of a tribe, or our grandparents; or by virtue of their expertise and contribution on a provided subject such as Albert Einstein in the area of Theoretical Physics and Leonardo da Vinci in the discipline of the Arts. Both formal and casual leaders practice a blend of leadership designs.
· Lewin's 3 basic leadership kinds - authoritative, participative, and delegative
· Likert's four leadership types - exploitive authoritative, benevolent authoritative, consultative, and participative
· Goleman's six emotional leadership types - visionary, coaching, affiliative, democratic, pacesetting, and commanding.
2. Leadership is a approach of turning out to be.
Though sure people today seem to be born with innate leadership characteristics, devoid of the correct surroundings and exposure, they could fail to cultivate their complete likely. So like studying how to experience a bicycle, you can also understand how to become a chief and hone your leadership capabilities. Information on leadership theories and knowledge could be formally gained by enrolling in leadership seminars, workshops, and conferences. Daily interactions with people present the prospect to observe and practice leadership theories. Collectively, formal and casual studying will assist you get leadership attitudes, acquire leadership insights, and therefore furthering the cycle of studying. You do not grow to be a leader in one particular day and just discontinue. Lifestyle-lengthy finding out is essential in turning out to be a great leader for every day brings new experiences that place your expertise, skills, and attitude to a test.
3. Leadership commences with you.
The finest way to create leadership qualities is to use it to your own existence. As an adage goes "motion speaks louder than words." Leaders are always in the limelight. Retain in head that your credibility as a chief depends much on your steps: your interaction with your family members, good friends, and co-employees; your way of managing your personalized and organizational obligations; and even the way you talk with the newspaper vendor throughout the street. Repeated steps grow to be routines. Behavior in turn type a person's character. Steven Covey's book entitled 7 Behavior of Extremely Effective Men and women offers great insights on how you can achieve personal leadership.
four. Leadership is shared.
Leadership is not the sole obligation of 1 particular person, but somewhat a shared responsibility amongst members of an emerging crew. A leader belongs to a group. Every member has responsibilities to fulfill. Formal leadership positions are just extra duties aside from their responsibilities as members of the staff. Efficient leadership calls for members to do their share of function. Commencing as a mere group of folks, members and leaders work towards the formation of an successful staff. In this light, social interaction plays a significant role in leadership. To find out how to perform collectively demands a excellent offer of believe in involving and among leaders and members of an emerging group. Trust is constructed upon actions and not just on words. When mutual respect exists, believe in is fostered and confidence is created.
5. Leadership types depend on the scenario.
How arrive dictatorship functions for Singapore but not in the United States of America? Aside from tradition, beliefs, value method, and form of authorities, the present scenario of a nation also affects the leadership kinds utilized by its formal leaders. There is no rule that only 1 style can be applied. Most of the time, leaders use a blend of leadership styles depending on the circumstances. In emergency scenarios these kinds of as periods of war and calamity, selection-generating is a make a difference of life and demise. Thus, a nation's chief can't pay for to talk to with all departments to arrive at critical decisions. The case is of course diverse in periods of peace and order---various sectors and other branches of government can freely interact and take part in governance. A different situation in stage is in leading organizations. When the staffs are hugely motivated and capable, a mixture of large delegative and reasonable participative designs of leadership is most acceptable. But if the staffs have minimal competence and minimal commitment, a mix of higher coaching, higher supporting, and higher directing conduct from organizational leaders is necessary.
Now that you are reminded of these items, retain in thoughts that there are always tips that we feel we currently know; ideas we take for granted, but are truly the most beneficial insights on leadership.
barrington screen printing
blank apparel chicago
Friday, April 22, 2011
Classic All-Star Intros: Campbell Conference 1984 All-Star Game
Player introductions for the Campbell Conference from the 1984 NHL All-Star Game played at the Meadowlands Arena in East Rutherford, New Jersey. Roster: Lanny McDonald - Calgary Flames Denis Savard - Chicago Black Hawks Doug Wilson - Chicago Black Hawks Murray Bannerman - Chicago Black Hawks John Ogrodnick - Detroit Red Wings Steve Yzerman - Detroit Red Wings Glenn Anderson - Edmonton Oilers Grant Fuhr - Edmonton Oilers Kevin Lowe - Edmonton Oilers Mark Messier - Edmonton Oilers Paul Coffey - Edmonton Oilers Wayne Gretzky - Edmonton Oilers Bernie Nicholls - Los Angeles Kings Charlie Simmer - Los Angeles Kings Brad Maxwell - Minnesota North Stars Brian Bellows - Minnsota North Stars Rob Ramage - St. Louis Blues Rick Vaive - Toronto Maple Leafs Darcy Rota - Vancouver Canucks Dave Babych - Winnipeg Jets
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upprNl_g_AA&hl=en
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upprNl_g_AA&hl=en
Thursday, April 21, 2011
The Neutral Space - Uno City
The UN city reveal the way Vienna perceives itself as a platform for international meetings at the heart of a united Europe. A long-standing tradition by the way, as much of the world's history has been and continues to be made-up here. Three different cultures intersect here whose idiosyncrasies have created a distinct atmosphere at the centre of Europe to which numerous summit meetings and international congresses held in Vienna since the mid 20th century bear vivid testimony.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Women Empowerment & Social development
Empowerment of women that will have lasting impacts must involve consciousness raising before the social construction of gender, which subordinates women in the family, class, caste, religion, or society, can be changed. The economic empowerment approach has relied on improving women's control over economic resources and strengthening women's economic security. The results also suggest that policies to raise women’s age at marriage, enhance their educations and open greater employment opportunities will also help to empower them, at least in some respects. Our goal is to cause policy, institutional and individual change that will improve the lives of women and girls everywhere.
Sunday, April 17, 2011
Several Schools Switch Conferences
This summer, an historic realignment of college athletics almost took place. The Big 12 conference found itself on the verge of collapse, the bulk of its members considering a move to either the Pac-10 or Big Ten conferences. The crisis was touched off by Nebraska, which was frustrated by low revenue, fleeing to the Big Ten conference. While the conference was ultimately saved, it was not without further casualties. The conference also lost Colorado, prompting moves in other parts of the country by Boise State and Utah. Fans can looks forward to seeing some radically different college football games in the near future.
The Big 12 suffers from having a glut of small markets outside of Texas, which leads to less television contract revenue than the other major athletics conferences. A new revenue sharing deal granting major teams like Texas kept the Big 12 together, but it is unclear how long this will last. Small markets also mean less merchandise and bowl game revenue, which could become more important as television revenue is impacted by an increase in viewers deciding to watch streaming college football online. Users can go to http://college-football-tv.com/, or similar sites, to watch college football games anywhere, without needing a television, which offers a more convenient option to an increasingly mobile nation. Struggling conferences like the Big 12 will need to keep this in mind if they wish to survive in the future.
The Pac-10, which enjoys far more revenue thanks to major markets in California, Washington and Arizona, managed to achieve its much sought after goal of expansion, though not to the extent it wanted. Despite an aggressive push to bring the Texas and Oklahoma schools into the fold, those universities opted to preserve the Big 12. Colorado, a smaller school, did not want to risk being left in the dust if the Big 12 did collapse, and bolted early. The Pac-10 needed to bring in a twelfth member to be eligible to hold a football championship game for the conference, and Utah, from the Mountain West Conference, was eager to get on board. Both teams will officially join the Pac-10 in 2012.
To fill the void left by Utah in the Mountain West Conference, Boise State shuffled over from the Western Athletic Conference (WAC). Once the rumors of realignment began, it was widely expected that Boise State would switch to a more prestigious conference. After years of success for the football program in the WAC, the program earned little national recognition, because of a consistently weak strength of schedule. Boise State will now be playing college football games against the likes of BYU and TCU, schools with slightly more national recognition than what they were used to facing in the past. It remains to be seen whether or not Boise State will continue their dominance in a new conference, or if that dominance will someday lead to a much sought after BCS championship game berth.
These teams won't be playing college football games against their new rivals this season, as all moves will not be finalized for another one or two years. Nebraska will join the Big Ten and Boise State will start playing in the MWC during the 2011 season, and the Pac-10 will need to wait until 2012 to welcome its newcomers. Until then, fans will only be able to speculate about how these four teams will fare in their new environments.
The Big 12 suffers from having a glut of small markets outside of Texas, which leads to less television contract revenue than the other major athletics conferences. A new revenue sharing deal granting major teams like Texas kept the Big 12 together, but it is unclear how long this will last. Small markets also mean less merchandise and bowl game revenue, which could become more important as television revenue is impacted by an increase in viewers deciding to watch streaming college football online. Users can go to http://college-football-tv.com/, or similar sites, to watch college football games anywhere, without needing a television, which offers a more convenient option to an increasingly mobile nation. Struggling conferences like the Big 12 will need to keep this in mind if they wish to survive in the future.
The Pac-10, which enjoys far more revenue thanks to major markets in California, Washington and Arizona, managed to achieve its much sought after goal of expansion, though not to the extent it wanted. Despite an aggressive push to bring the Texas and Oklahoma schools into the fold, those universities opted to preserve the Big 12. Colorado, a smaller school, did not want to risk being left in the dust if the Big 12 did collapse, and bolted early. The Pac-10 needed to bring in a twelfth member to be eligible to hold a football championship game for the conference, and Utah, from the Mountain West Conference, was eager to get on board. Both teams will officially join the Pac-10 in 2012.
To fill the void left by Utah in the Mountain West Conference, Boise State shuffled over from the Western Athletic Conference (WAC). Once the rumors of realignment began, it was widely expected that Boise State would switch to a more prestigious conference. After years of success for the football program in the WAC, the program earned little national recognition, because of a consistently weak strength of schedule. Boise State will now be playing college football games against the likes of BYU and TCU, schools with slightly more national recognition than what they were used to facing in the past. It remains to be seen whether or not Boise State will continue their dominance in a new conference, or if that dominance will someday lead to a much sought after BCS championship game berth.
These teams won't be playing college football games against their new rivals this season, as all moves will not be finalized for another one or two years. Nebraska will join the Big Ten and Boise State will start playing in the MWC during the 2011 season, and the Pac-10 will need to wait until 2012 to welcome its newcomers. Until then, fans will only be able to speculate about how these four teams will fare in their new environments.
Saturday, April 16, 2011
Cora Marrett: National Science Foundation Regional Grants Conference
Watch video from the National Science Foundation Regional Grants Conference. The second National Science Foundation Regional Grants Conference of fiscal year 2011 was hosted by Vanderbilt University on March 21-22, 2011, at Loews Vanderbilt Hotel. Key officials representing each NSF program directorate, administrative office, the NSF Office of International Science and Engineering, Office of General Counsel and Office of the Inspector General participated in this two-day conference. Cora Marrett, deputy director/special advisor for NSF, delivered the luncheon keynote on March 21. Topics covered include an introduction to NSF; NSF's proposal preparation and merit review process; award management; conflict of interest policies; new programs and initiatives; cross-disciplinary and special interest programs; and breakout sessions by discipline. More information is available on the conference website: www.signup4.net
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFL1tgQfCLI&hl=en
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFL1tgQfCLI&hl=en
Friday, April 15, 2011
The Tyranny of Experts (part I) - the Limits of Expertise
"An expert! An expert! My kingdom for an expert who will prove me right!"
No, King Richard wanted a horse. But today's public and political warriors need something more modern than horses to run rough-shod over their opponents. They need experts.
Experts are quite useful people to have on retainer, or to be able to pull up from Wikipedia on demand. It's even more useful to be an expert yourself. You can play on your expertise far beyond your field of useful knowledge - just ask Dr. Laura, or Al Gore.
Expertise is extremely valuable, necessary even, in a wide range of human endeavors. Want to build a better microprocessor? Hire yourself a fleet of electrical and computer engineers. Want to pay the taxes you owe and not a penny more? Hire an accountant. Want to understand the ways hegemonic imperial state power has shaped the discourses of post-colonial nations? Hire an assistant professor of non-western English literatures... please?
We need experts to accomplish many of our great goals. To gather, sift and organize new knowledge; to apply basic research in order to engineer new possibilities; to better understand the physical and human worlds we live in. Experts are well trained in narrow specialties that enable them to do original, creative things. Expertise is often accompanied by experience, commitment and dedication.
But there are limits to the utility of experts. Experts can be banal. Experts can be elitist and authoritarian. Experts can be bought. Experts can be highly biased and ideological. Experts can be as foolish and fallible as anyone else. Experts can bludgeon dissent and frighten lay people into obedience. Experts and expertise can be a two-edged sword, particularly in the realm of civil society. We need experts for many things, but we cannot surrender to experts our opportunities - our responsibilities - to engage the world as intelligent, passionate, informed citizens. Indeed, we must break off the tyranny of experts and actively strive to save our corners of the world one idea at a time.
Tyranny of Experts
Experts cultivate authority. Their degrees, their awards, their publications, their experience all demonstrate and elevate their authority. We listen to them and trust them and pay them because they speak authoritatively about things we are not sure of ourselves. But the authority of experts can extend further. Expertise can be a club to bludgeon dissent; it can be a shield against criticism; it can be a muzzle to silence debate and create apathy. In addition, experts are often far from objective. To the contrary they are often highly ideological. Undue deference to experts can lead to a kind of tyranny. Sometimes experts indeed know things we do not. But in cases of civil society, there is little they know that you do not; and in no case ought they to replace your participation in public debate.
Experts hold strong ideological positions. They are not objective, and few would claim to be if you asked them. If an expert asserts objectivity, they are probably using their authority to try to convince you of a powerful piece of ideology. Experts are often ideological precisely because they are experts. Why would you dedicate 3 or 5 or 8 years gaining a doctoral degree on some narrow field or issue if you were not passionate about it to begin with? It often is not for the money, because there are easier ways to make a buck. It is because they care a great deal. They cared when they started their training, and their subsequent research, practice and experience make them more passionately dedicated. But sometimes experts used their expert status to shield their ideology. When the distinguished professor of biophysics stands before you and speaks passionately about the influence of greenhouse gasses on ocean temperatures, remember that she cared deeply about environmentalism long before she began graduate school; and all of her degrees, federal research grants, field studies and teaching seminars have strengthened that ideological resolve. None of that makes her assertions necessarily false; it just recognizes her ideological position.
Experts are also usually terribly stubborn and uncompromising. Science and academia value flexibility, tolerance, and the willingness to alter conclusions upon seeing new data. But experts know a lot of stuff. Their worldviews are complex, sophisticated, and mature. And, as noted above, they are passionate believers in their philosophical and ideological systems. They are unfamiliar with changing their minds, and they are unwilling to bend without much convincing. These people are not sophomores discovering themselves and their world anew. These are doctors who have it figured out. This is why debates over minute disagreements between experts within a field can be so acrimonious.
Experts surround themselves with symbols of authority. When challenged, they sometimes make the mistake of shielding themselves behind expertise or office, rather and engaging in discussion or debate. In our modern egalitarian world, few people understand hierarchy better than experts. The assistant professor challenges the chair or dean at her peril. The lawyer does not attack the judge. If the Senate staff member attacks a Cabinet member, he had better do it with an anonymous leak. Similarly, in the authoritarian space of a classroom, many students learn the very unfortunate lesson that some professors will not abide being challenged or questioned by an undergraduate student. Everyone who has played the card game 'war' knows that a queen beats a deuce. The most natural response to criticism is to question the credentials, publications, experience or office of the critic. An expert's critics are not good scientists; they are outside the scientific consensus; they have not seen the evidence or the classified documents; they do not understand the theory. What then follows is often an incomprehensible, jargon laden defense of their position meant to subdue the poor sophomore who dared cross the doctor's path. In this manner, expertise is used to limit discussion and dissent. It serves to make non-experts insecure, silent, obedient and eventually apathetic.
The Limits of Experts and Expertise
What the plethora of authoritative experts around us conceals is that there are some very important things that experts cannot and should not do. There are some basic limits to expertise. First, experts are often banal or obvious. Did you really need an expert with a federal grant to tell you that children find Rembrandt or Bach beautiful? What would you do without the expert who tells you that lack of sleep makes driving more dangerous? How many different committees need to reshape the food pyramid? - and they still cannot agree on what your mother knew very well: 'Eat your vegetables and then go out and play!' Clearly not all expert conclusions are obvious. But many an expensive lab has been funded to discover and document the obvious. Second and more troubling, experts are often used to substantiate, as truths, claims that are highly contested. Expert says, 'zero tolerance enforcement leads to lower crime rate.' Well you may or not agree with that assertion. And it does not make one bit of difference which experts assert it. It is a contested conclusion. In both cases, whether the expert's conclusions are banal or completely contested, they do not change our view of the world.
Next, expertise, by its very nature is limiting. Experts devote themselves to something specific and narrow. You cannot possibly be an expert of very much. That does not stop some experts from asserting that they can speak authoritatively about whatever they want. But they are actually only experts of a narrow field. Civil society requires that all people - whether they are experts of some narrow thing or not - engage a broad array of issues. I happen to be an expert of a narrow historical field. But I believe passionately that we all ought to be engaged and speak and be heard across the full array of issues that shape our particular worlds. When I strive to engage in public debates on social or political or ideological issues, no one need care what degrees I have. I speak as a person engaged in civil discourse. The broad field of civil society should not be tilted in favor of experts with degrees, titles, offices or narrow expertise.
Most importantly, expertise and degrees do not confer wisdom, ethics, responsibility, morality or philanthropy. Experts are human - just like you. Experts can be proud, elitist and condescending. As noted above, they can resort to ad hominem attacks when challenged. They are often biased. Fundamentally, their expertise does not give them the hidden answers to difficult problems regarding where society ought to place its priorities, or how tax dollars should be spent, or for whom you should vote. Their positions are as likely to be foolish, muddled, irresponsible or selfish as anyone else's. Their ideas, ideals or ideological positions may be compelling, useful, effective, and even visionary. But their status as an expert has no influence on any of that. Within the context of civil society, judge them by quality of their ideas - no more; no less.
There are also some very basic things that experts cannot do. 1 - Experts cannot predict the future. They just can't. An expert who claims to predict the future, whether he or she is a biologist, an economist or a historian, is a charlatan. 2 - Experts cannot direct your principled, moral decisions on public policy issues. You, as a citizen of your community and nation bear that responsibility alone. 3 - Experts cannot and never will form the substance and character of civil society. Functional civil society must be constituted by the broadest possible array of educated, dedicated, engaged, principled, informed citizens. And in the absence of thoroughly educated, dedicated, engaged, principled, informed citizens, you and I will have to do the best we can along with everybody else. The other option is the oligarchic rule of experts and elites, which is the antithesis of civil society. Sadly, the proliferation of experts and the dependence upon them actually damages civil society by spreading apathy, passivity, voluntary disenfranchisement, and silence.
The Emancipation of Civil Society
We live in an expanding universe. Our societies face profound change, serious challenges and unique opportunities. Technological, social, political and economic change offer us innovations as well as disruptions. In order to grasp opportunities as well as manage and solve problems, we need to build stronger communities of engaged citizens. Among a variety of new opportunities, the internet provides us with new spaces to speak and powerful new ways to broadcast our voices. Healthy civil society needs to be emancipated from experts in order to enable the widest possible participation. Civil society, activism, public debate and good governance must be practiced, not lectured or taught.
Complex problems and opportunities require the engagement and commitment of a knowledgeable, responsibility civil society. We must be willing to examine and evaluate many positions. We must be willing to debate, to disagree, and eventually to compromise. Experts are often necessary to this process. But they should not dominate it; and we cannot apathetically surrender the process to experts. A large, diverse, engaged body of citizens is more valuable than any number of experts. Our societies need the combined wisdom, energy, interest and passion of multitudes. We live in an expanding universe. There is room in the expanding universe for each of us to engage and speak and act. But the growing specialization and technicality of the expanding universe can be daunting. Experts can amplify those fears - to everyone's detriment. We cannot allow experts to rule the expanding universe.
No, King Richard wanted a horse. But today's public and political warriors need something more modern than horses to run rough-shod over their opponents. They need experts.
Experts are quite useful people to have on retainer, or to be able to pull up from Wikipedia on demand. It's even more useful to be an expert yourself. You can play on your expertise far beyond your field of useful knowledge - just ask Dr. Laura, or Al Gore.
Expertise is extremely valuable, necessary even, in a wide range of human endeavors. Want to build a better microprocessor? Hire yourself a fleet of electrical and computer engineers. Want to pay the taxes you owe and not a penny more? Hire an accountant. Want to understand the ways hegemonic imperial state power has shaped the discourses of post-colonial nations? Hire an assistant professor of non-western English literatures... please?
We need experts to accomplish many of our great goals. To gather, sift and organize new knowledge; to apply basic research in order to engineer new possibilities; to better understand the physical and human worlds we live in. Experts are well trained in narrow specialties that enable them to do original, creative things. Expertise is often accompanied by experience, commitment and dedication.
But there are limits to the utility of experts. Experts can be banal. Experts can be elitist and authoritarian. Experts can be bought. Experts can be highly biased and ideological. Experts can be as foolish and fallible as anyone else. Experts can bludgeon dissent and frighten lay people into obedience. Experts and expertise can be a two-edged sword, particularly in the realm of civil society. We need experts for many things, but we cannot surrender to experts our opportunities - our responsibilities - to engage the world as intelligent, passionate, informed citizens. Indeed, we must break off the tyranny of experts and actively strive to save our corners of the world one idea at a time.
Tyranny of Experts
Experts cultivate authority. Their degrees, their awards, their publications, their experience all demonstrate and elevate their authority. We listen to them and trust them and pay them because they speak authoritatively about things we are not sure of ourselves. But the authority of experts can extend further. Expertise can be a club to bludgeon dissent; it can be a shield against criticism; it can be a muzzle to silence debate and create apathy. In addition, experts are often far from objective. To the contrary they are often highly ideological. Undue deference to experts can lead to a kind of tyranny. Sometimes experts indeed know things we do not. But in cases of civil society, there is little they know that you do not; and in no case ought they to replace your participation in public debate.
Experts hold strong ideological positions. They are not objective, and few would claim to be if you asked them. If an expert asserts objectivity, they are probably using their authority to try to convince you of a powerful piece of ideology. Experts are often ideological precisely because they are experts. Why would you dedicate 3 or 5 or 8 years gaining a doctoral degree on some narrow field or issue if you were not passionate about it to begin with? It often is not for the money, because there are easier ways to make a buck. It is because they care a great deal. They cared when they started their training, and their subsequent research, practice and experience make them more passionately dedicated. But sometimes experts used their expert status to shield their ideology. When the distinguished professor of biophysics stands before you and speaks passionately about the influence of greenhouse gasses on ocean temperatures, remember that she cared deeply about environmentalism long before she began graduate school; and all of her degrees, federal research grants, field studies and teaching seminars have strengthened that ideological resolve. None of that makes her assertions necessarily false; it just recognizes her ideological position.
Experts are also usually terribly stubborn and uncompromising. Science and academia value flexibility, tolerance, and the willingness to alter conclusions upon seeing new data. But experts know a lot of stuff. Their worldviews are complex, sophisticated, and mature. And, as noted above, they are passionate believers in their philosophical and ideological systems. They are unfamiliar with changing their minds, and they are unwilling to bend without much convincing. These people are not sophomores discovering themselves and their world anew. These are doctors who have it figured out. This is why debates over minute disagreements between experts within a field can be so acrimonious.
Experts surround themselves with symbols of authority. When challenged, they sometimes make the mistake of shielding themselves behind expertise or office, rather and engaging in discussion or debate. In our modern egalitarian world, few people understand hierarchy better than experts. The assistant professor challenges the chair or dean at her peril. The lawyer does not attack the judge. If the Senate staff member attacks a Cabinet member, he had better do it with an anonymous leak. Similarly, in the authoritarian space of a classroom, many students learn the very unfortunate lesson that some professors will not abide being challenged or questioned by an undergraduate student. Everyone who has played the card game 'war' knows that a queen beats a deuce. The most natural response to criticism is to question the credentials, publications, experience or office of the critic. An expert's critics are not good scientists; they are outside the scientific consensus; they have not seen the evidence or the classified documents; they do not understand the theory. What then follows is often an incomprehensible, jargon laden defense of their position meant to subdue the poor sophomore who dared cross the doctor's path. In this manner, expertise is used to limit discussion and dissent. It serves to make non-experts insecure, silent, obedient and eventually apathetic.
The Limits of Experts and Expertise
What the plethora of authoritative experts around us conceals is that there are some very important things that experts cannot and should not do. There are some basic limits to expertise. First, experts are often banal or obvious. Did you really need an expert with a federal grant to tell you that children find Rembrandt or Bach beautiful? What would you do without the expert who tells you that lack of sleep makes driving more dangerous? How many different committees need to reshape the food pyramid? - and they still cannot agree on what your mother knew very well: 'Eat your vegetables and then go out and play!' Clearly not all expert conclusions are obvious. But many an expensive lab has been funded to discover and document the obvious. Second and more troubling, experts are often used to substantiate, as truths, claims that are highly contested. Expert says, 'zero tolerance enforcement leads to lower crime rate.' Well you may or not agree with that assertion. And it does not make one bit of difference which experts assert it. It is a contested conclusion. In both cases, whether the expert's conclusions are banal or completely contested, they do not change our view of the world.
Next, expertise, by its very nature is limiting. Experts devote themselves to something specific and narrow. You cannot possibly be an expert of very much. That does not stop some experts from asserting that they can speak authoritatively about whatever they want. But they are actually only experts of a narrow field. Civil society requires that all people - whether they are experts of some narrow thing or not - engage a broad array of issues. I happen to be an expert of a narrow historical field. But I believe passionately that we all ought to be engaged and speak and be heard across the full array of issues that shape our particular worlds. When I strive to engage in public debates on social or political or ideological issues, no one need care what degrees I have. I speak as a person engaged in civil discourse. The broad field of civil society should not be tilted in favor of experts with degrees, titles, offices or narrow expertise.
Most importantly, expertise and degrees do not confer wisdom, ethics, responsibility, morality or philanthropy. Experts are human - just like you. Experts can be proud, elitist and condescending. As noted above, they can resort to ad hominem attacks when challenged. They are often biased. Fundamentally, their expertise does not give them the hidden answers to difficult problems regarding where society ought to place its priorities, or how tax dollars should be spent, or for whom you should vote. Their positions are as likely to be foolish, muddled, irresponsible or selfish as anyone else's. Their ideas, ideals or ideological positions may be compelling, useful, effective, and even visionary. But their status as an expert has no influence on any of that. Within the context of civil society, judge them by quality of their ideas - no more; no less.
There are also some very basic things that experts cannot do. 1 - Experts cannot predict the future. They just can't. An expert who claims to predict the future, whether he or she is a biologist, an economist or a historian, is a charlatan. 2 - Experts cannot direct your principled, moral decisions on public policy issues. You, as a citizen of your community and nation bear that responsibility alone. 3 - Experts cannot and never will form the substance and character of civil society. Functional civil society must be constituted by the broadest possible array of educated, dedicated, engaged, principled, informed citizens. And in the absence of thoroughly educated, dedicated, engaged, principled, informed citizens, you and I will have to do the best we can along with everybody else. The other option is the oligarchic rule of experts and elites, which is the antithesis of civil society. Sadly, the proliferation of experts and the dependence upon them actually damages civil society by spreading apathy, passivity, voluntary disenfranchisement, and silence.
The Emancipation of Civil Society
We live in an expanding universe. Our societies face profound change, serious challenges and unique opportunities. Technological, social, political and economic change offer us innovations as well as disruptions. In order to grasp opportunities as well as manage and solve problems, we need to build stronger communities of engaged citizens. Among a variety of new opportunities, the internet provides us with new spaces to speak and powerful new ways to broadcast our voices. Healthy civil society needs to be emancipated from experts in order to enable the widest possible participation. Civil society, activism, public debate and good governance must be practiced, not lectured or taught.
Complex problems and opportunities require the engagement and commitment of a knowledgeable, responsibility civil society. We must be willing to examine and evaluate many positions. We must be willing to debate, to disagree, and eventually to compromise. Experts are often necessary to this process. But they should not dominate it; and we cannot apathetically surrender the process to experts. A large, diverse, engaged body of citizens is more valuable than any number of experts. Our societies need the combined wisdom, energy, interest and passion of multitudes. We live in an expanding universe. There is room in the expanding universe for each of us to engage and speak and act. But the growing specialization and technicality of the expanding universe can be daunting. Experts can amplify those fears - to everyone's detriment. We cannot allow experts to rule the expanding universe.
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Football Manager 2011 community
Humankind love with football is just incredible and the proof of it is persistently mounting fans of Football Manager 2011 - the most impressive game and therefore making it the most genuine, contribution Sports Interactive Games created for some years. For the moment, it is the most excellent football management game in the world. Its depth, pragmatism and total addictiveness are unchallengeable.
Dynamic league reputation
The much-requested "dynamic league reputation" was added to the game particularly for FM community and for those people who play the game managing a team in a nation with lower reputation, and take the club to success, the reputation of that nation's league will raise. Many features together with the design of the box had previously been announced on the 23 July 2010, before any other official announcements were made by SIG and SEGA. Sports Interactive Studio Director Miles Jacobson stated that some of the leaked information on Football Manager Blogs was really accurate, though some was not. Other features of Football Manager 11 that were posted on the blog from Miles Jacobson included match analysis enhancements, Press Conference revamp, squad registration, B-Team & Amateur alteration. In comparison with previous versions of the game the post-match analysis looks quiteenhanced this time.
Agents
New FM 2011 features addition should give you an idea about the actual enhancements game has made from its previous versions. Player agent roles have been improved and there are five types of agents discussing contracts. Some will give you a blank page for contract talks, and others can inquiry too much. Discussions with a player and his agent were made "tete a tete" to boost the realism of the game.
Many game enhancements
Communication with players and other managers has been enhanced by means of new confidential conversations. There are also new-made board requests as element of this changed UI, including appealing larger percentage of transfer revenue and requesting a new stadium if the current one cannot be extended. The news section and inbox have been joined going along with a new look. The match engine was improved to incorporate player emotions. Football players respond more transparently to what is occurring on the playing field. Trainings became better and there are 14 extra areas to train players in. Moreover, a new match training part allows you to train team in explicit tactical formations.
FM 2011 release and its patches
A Demo of the game was released on Mirrorfootball.co.uk together with Steam on October, 21. Classically it granted users to play just a half of a season which can be continued in the full version. In the end Football Manager 2011 came out to the world on 26 November 2010 together with the first patch numbered as 11.1.0. The following patch 11.1.1 was released on 12 November. It contained fixes of some minor game problems. The patch 11.2.0 became available on 16 December which improved the match engine and fixed many annoying issues. The final and most valuable patch for FM 2011 has come out on the 8th of March. It has been numbered as 11.3.0.
Growth of Football Manager 2011 community
Sports Interactive and Sega have many affiliated sites: TrueFootballManager.com, FMScout.com, Sortitoutsi.com, FMCrowd.com, FMBase.co.uk. The community sites assist people in playing Football Manager 2011, allow to share opinions their game stories, provide helpful guides. Chiefly, it is about having fun. It's also great to see that a "news roundup" from the FM community sites is emitted on the main Football Manager site consisting of the highlights from the community for the last 2 weeks.
Dynamic league reputation
The much-requested "dynamic league reputation" was added to the game particularly for FM community and for those people who play the game managing a team in a nation with lower reputation, and take the club to success, the reputation of that nation's league will raise. Many features together with the design of the box had previously been announced on the 23 July 2010, before any other official announcements were made by SIG and SEGA. Sports Interactive Studio Director Miles Jacobson stated that some of the leaked information on Football Manager Blogs was really accurate, though some was not. Other features of Football Manager 11 that were posted on the blog from Miles Jacobson included match analysis enhancements, Press Conference revamp, squad registration, B-Team & Amateur alteration. In comparison with previous versions of the game the post-match analysis looks quiteenhanced this time.
Agents
New FM 2011 features addition should give you an idea about the actual enhancements game has made from its previous versions. Player agent roles have been improved and there are five types of agents discussing contracts. Some will give you a blank page for contract talks, and others can inquiry too much. Discussions with a player and his agent were made "tete a tete" to boost the realism of the game.
Many game enhancements
Communication with players and other managers has been enhanced by means of new confidential conversations. There are also new-made board requests as element of this changed UI, including appealing larger percentage of transfer revenue and requesting a new stadium if the current one cannot be extended. The news section and inbox have been joined going along with a new look. The match engine was improved to incorporate player emotions. Football players respond more transparently to what is occurring on the playing field. Trainings became better and there are 14 extra areas to train players in. Moreover, a new match training part allows you to train team in explicit tactical formations.
FM 2011 release and its patches
A Demo of the game was released on Mirrorfootball.co.uk together with Steam on October, 21. Classically it granted users to play just a half of a season which can be continued in the full version. In the end Football Manager 2011 came out to the world on 26 November 2010 together with the first patch numbered as 11.1.0. The following patch 11.1.1 was released on 12 November. It contained fixes of some minor game problems. The patch 11.2.0 became available on 16 December which improved the match engine and fixed many annoying issues. The final and most valuable patch for FM 2011 has come out on the 8th of March. It has been numbered as 11.3.0.
Growth of Football Manager 2011 community
Sports Interactive and Sega have many affiliated sites: TrueFootballManager.com, FMScout.com, Sortitoutsi.com, FMCrowd.com, FMBase.co.uk. The community sites assist people in playing Football Manager 2011, allow to share opinions their game stories, provide helpful guides. Chiefly, it is about having fun. It's also great to see that a "news roundup" from the FM community sites is emitted on the main Football Manager site consisting of the highlights from the community for the last 2 weeks.
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Cha Medical Gruop(representative: Kwang Yul Cha) Will Bring Hope to Incurable Disease Treatment
College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University(Representative : Kwang Yul Cha M.D) & CHA Medical Group's biotechnology venture business, CHA Biotech(Board of Director: Kwang Yul Cha) was established for the development of cell therapy using stem cell that is so-called the "Flower of the Medical Science" in September 2000. CHA Biotec, led by Kwang Yul Cha, is now promoting to form large-scale stem cell institute in both U.S and Korea by building CHA Medical Stem Cell Institute organized of 180 professionals focusing on stem cell treatment and cord blood deposit and transplantation. CHA Medical Group led by Kwang Yul Cha M.D will start constructing 'CHA Institute' in 2009 at Pangyo Techno Valley and it is scheduled to open in 2010.
'CHA Group Stem Cell Institute' has not only research facilities such as stem cell institute, GMP grade sterile culture room which can make the medicines, cord blood bank, immunity vaccine institute, artificial internal organ institute but also life science school, medical school to train professionals. After Stem cell institute is completed, it will be equipped with Lab to Patient System which can pursue clinical demonstration at Bundang CHA Hospital immediately from latest research. And it is expected to joint research with the world’s leading research institute in the stem cell institute. They planned to promote cooperating with the world’s famous stem cell institute such as UCLA(University of California at Los Angeles), Columbia University, Alabama State University , Rice University, University of Southern California, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Harvard University McLean Hospital etc.
And few months ago, College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University (representative: Kwang Yul Cha M.D) held “The 5th Pacific Rim Society for Fertility and Sterility” in Dynasty Hall, Seoul Shilla Hotel from June 9th~10th to conquer the low birth late, inviting the world’s foremost scholars in the field of sterilization and reproductive medicine. 'The 5th Pacific Rim Society for Fertility and Sterility' held by CHA Medical Group(Representative : Kwang Yul Cha) is hosted by three leading institute; The Korean Society of Fertility & Sterility, The Korean Society of preservative reproductive medicine, and The Korean Society of Developmetal Biology. Nationally and internationally well-known authorities on the field of Sterilization and reproductive medicine from Korea, United States, and Japan announced their papers and about 500 participants from Thailand, India, Vietnam and Nepal enlighten the conference.
At first day of the conference, representative Cha Kwang Yul read the paper 'Slush Nitrogen Ovum Freezing method' that received 'The Best Paper Award' from 'World Society for Reproductive Medicine' and the head manager of Stem Cell Institute, Hyung-Min Jung made presentation over embryonic cell and was greeted enthusiastically by the participants. The survival rate of ovum is about 50 percents when applying the Existing Ovum Freezing Method. On the other hand, Slush-Nitrogen Ovum Freezing Method raise the survival rate to over 90 percents that it initiated the way to activate the ovum bank.
Stem Cell Production Capacity: CHA Medical Group(representative: Kwang Yul Cha) created total 12 Human Embryonic Stem Cell and under the admission of the International Stem Cell Deliberate Council, CHA Medical Group(representative: Kwang Yul Cha) is planning to produce over 100 embryonic stem cell that are able to apply clinical demonstration using human supporting cell, serum and non-serum culture medium at GMP within 10 years.
World known cytogenesis capacity & ability: CHA Medical Group(representative: Kwang Yul Cha) is the first to success in recovering the damage of cranial nerves by transplanting the mice's embyonic stem cell into alive one's brain. Developed differentiation technology by using neuron, vascular Endothelial, Cartilage Cell, Endocrine Cell, and Heart muscle cells.
Gene Manipulation in Human embryonic stem cell: By developing technology that can induct specific gene into Human Embryonic Cell CHA Medical Group achieved cytogeny technology in specific cell, Human Embryonic Stem Cell production, medicinal screening method, Tumor Suppressor Technology, and interpreting the function of the specific gene.
Gene Therapy ability: Found cancer cell suppressor protein and enzyme gene called 'mHAUSP' that operates the cancer-suppressing activity. Now researches on therapy and clinical test on progressing.
Artificial organ production ability: By Utilizing embryonic stem call and adult stem cell developed biodegradable tissue, instestine and Scaffold, Researches on three-dimensional artificial tissue and intestine production is in advance.
Leading the Cell Therapy Product market using stem cell: If applied-technology such as cytogenesis and cell therapy utilizing embryonic stem cell is practically use, size of over 600 billion won market will be created. To treat specific diseases(Leukemia, Diabetes, urinary incontinece, stroke) cell differentiation inducement and establishing stem cell lines bank using Embryonic Stem Cell and Adult Stem Cell is promoted.
Researches on Sterility & Stem Cell Security is guaranteed by running 'Human Ovum Freezing Bank: 'Slushed-Nitrogen Ovum Freezing Method' has survival rate over 90 percents and pregnancy rate is over 65%, too. The method described above is known as world's best technology that has similar reproduction ability to general ovum. CHA Biotech (Board of Director:Kwang Yul Cha) became the leader of this field by steadily executing safe and moral stem cell and medical treatment on sterility by running freezing bank.
CHA Regenerative Medical Institute, awarded the grant "Patient-Specific Stem Cell Production": Awarded the grant related to patient-specific stem cell production using somac cell reproduction from WIRB in June, 2006. Using Human ovum Freezing Bank, developing patient-specific stem cell production and treatment technology is their aim.
==Who is ''Kwang-Yul Cha''?==
Kwang Yul Cha is certified Obstetrics and Gynecology by College of Medicine, Yonsei University-Board. He is the president of Infertility Medical Center, CHA General Hospital, Chancellor of the College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University and Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. College of Medicine, Columbia University. Kwang Yul Cha Published over 100 articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
※About Kwang Yul Cha, MD, PhD
-MD, Yonsei University School of Medicine
-PhD, Pochon CHA University College of Medicine
-Reproductive Endocrinology Specialist
-Fellowship, USC
-Visiting Professor, Columbia University School of Medicine
-Chancellor, Pochon CHA University (present)
-CEO, CHA HEALTH SYSTEMS, Inc. (present)
-Chairman, Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center (present)
-Director, CHA RMI (present)
-Co-Director, CHA Stem Cell Institute, Pochon CHA University College of Medicine (present)
-80 international papers and 200domestic papers, 15 books, 3 patents
'CHA Group Stem Cell Institute' has not only research facilities such as stem cell institute, GMP grade sterile culture room which can make the medicines, cord blood bank, immunity vaccine institute, artificial internal organ institute but also life science school, medical school to train professionals. After Stem cell institute is completed, it will be equipped with Lab to Patient System which can pursue clinical demonstration at Bundang CHA Hospital immediately from latest research. And it is expected to joint research with the world’s leading research institute in the stem cell institute. They planned to promote cooperating with the world’s famous stem cell institute such as UCLA(University of California at Los Angeles), Columbia University, Alabama State University , Rice University, University of Southern California, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Harvard University McLean Hospital etc.
And few months ago, College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University (representative: Kwang Yul Cha M.D) held “The 5th Pacific Rim Society for Fertility and Sterility” in Dynasty Hall, Seoul Shilla Hotel from June 9th~10th to conquer the low birth late, inviting the world’s foremost scholars in the field of sterilization and reproductive medicine. 'The 5th Pacific Rim Society for Fertility and Sterility' held by CHA Medical Group(Representative : Kwang Yul Cha) is hosted by three leading institute; The Korean Society of Fertility & Sterility, The Korean Society of preservative reproductive medicine, and The Korean Society of Developmetal Biology. Nationally and internationally well-known authorities on the field of Sterilization and reproductive medicine from Korea, United States, and Japan announced their papers and about 500 participants from Thailand, India, Vietnam and Nepal enlighten the conference.
At first day of the conference, representative Cha Kwang Yul read the paper 'Slush Nitrogen Ovum Freezing method' that received 'The Best Paper Award' from 'World Society for Reproductive Medicine' and the head manager of Stem Cell Institute, Hyung-Min Jung made presentation over embryonic cell and was greeted enthusiastically by the participants. The survival rate of ovum is about 50 percents when applying the Existing Ovum Freezing Method. On the other hand, Slush-Nitrogen Ovum Freezing Method raise the survival rate to over 90 percents that it initiated the way to activate the ovum bank.
Stem Cell Production Capacity: CHA Medical Group(representative: Kwang Yul Cha) created total 12 Human Embryonic Stem Cell and under the admission of the International Stem Cell Deliberate Council, CHA Medical Group(representative: Kwang Yul Cha) is planning to produce over 100 embryonic stem cell that are able to apply clinical demonstration using human supporting cell, serum and non-serum culture medium at GMP within 10 years.
World known cytogenesis capacity & ability: CHA Medical Group(representative: Kwang Yul Cha) is the first to success in recovering the damage of cranial nerves by transplanting the mice's embyonic stem cell into alive one's brain. Developed differentiation technology by using neuron, vascular Endothelial, Cartilage Cell, Endocrine Cell, and Heart muscle cells.
Gene Manipulation in Human embryonic stem cell: By developing technology that can induct specific gene into Human Embryonic Cell CHA Medical Group achieved cytogeny technology in specific cell, Human Embryonic Stem Cell production, medicinal screening method, Tumor Suppressor Technology, and interpreting the function of the specific gene.
Gene Therapy ability: Found cancer cell suppressor protein and enzyme gene called 'mHAUSP' that operates the cancer-suppressing activity. Now researches on therapy and clinical test on progressing.
Artificial organ production ability: By Utilizing embryonic stem call and adult stem cell developed biodegradable tissue, instestine and Scaffold, Researches on three-dimensional artificial tissue and intestine production is in advance.
Leading the Cell Therapy Product market using stem cell: If applied-technology such as cytogenesis and cell therapy utilizing embryonic stem cell is practically use, size of over 600 billion won market will be created. To treat specific diseases(Leukemia, Diabetes, urinary incontinece, stroke) cell differentiation inducement and establishing stem cell lines bank using Embryonic Stem Cell and Adult Stem Cell is promoted.
Researches on Sterility & Stem Cell Security is guaranteed by running 'Human Ovum Freezing Bank: 'Slushed-Nitrogen Ovum Freezing Method' has survival rate over 90 percents and pregnancy rate is over 65%, too. The method described above is known as world's best technology that has similar reproduction ability to general ovum. CHA Biotech (Board of Director:Kwang Yul Cha) became the leader of this field by steadily executing safe and moral stem cell and medical treatment on sterility by running freezing bank.
CHA Regenerative Medical Institute, awarded the grant "Patient-Specific Stem Cell Production": Awarded the grant related to patient-specific stem cell production using somac cell reproduction from WIRB in June, 2006. Using Human ovum Freezing Bank, developing patient-specific stem cell production and treatment technology is their aim.
==Who is ''Kwang-Yul Cha''?==
Kwang Yul Cha is certified Obstetrics and Gynecology by College of Medicine, Yonsei University-Board. He is the president of Infertility Medical Center, CHA General Hospital, Chancellor of the College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University and Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. College of Medicine, Columbia University. Kwang Yul Cha Published over 100 articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
※About Kwang Yul Cha, MD, PhD
-MD, Yonsei University School of Medicine
-PhD, Pochon CHA University College of Medicine
-Reproductive Endocrinology Specialist
-Fellowship, USC
-Visiting Professor, Columbia University School of Medicine
-Chancellor, Pochon CHA University (present)
-CEO, CHA HEALTH SYSTEMS, Inc. (present)
-Chairman, Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center (present)
-Director, CHA RMI (present)
-Co-Director, CHA Stem Cell Institute, Pochon CHA University College of Medicine (present)
-80 international papers and 200domestic papers, 15 books, 3 patents
Monday, April 11, 2011
Rare Good University - Oregano State University
Located in Corvallis , Oregon , Unites States of America , Oregano State University ( OSU ) is a coeducational, public research university offering undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral degrees and a multitude of research opportunities.
It is recognized as one of the 73 operating Land Grants University of the World. It also is recognized as sea-grant, space-grant, and sun-grant. Amongst the several state universities , it is the only public university and one of the only two overall universities in the world to manage all the four grants.
According to a 2007 study of the top 500 universities of the world, this university was ranked higher than any other university in Oregon . It features in top 70 American universities while worldwide, the school is ranked in top 150 universities. It also features in top 50 universities of the US according to magazine STACK. It is ranked 29 th in the same list. It is also recognized as a University with very high research activity.
Components of the University
It was found in 1856 when Corvallis Academy was founded. In 1858, name was change to Corvallis College on the orders of Freemasons. October 27, 1868 is known as OSU Charter Day.
The Colleges of Agricultural Sciences, Business, Education, Engineering, Forestry, Health & Human Sciences, Liberal Arts, Oceanic & Atmospheric Sciences, Pharmacy, Science, and Veterinary Medicine are the various colleges that form the university.
It awards Bachelor's degrees in a number of different disciplines, including Agriculture studies, American studies, botany, computer science, environmental engineering, forest engineering, horticulture, liberal studies, merchandising management, nutrition and food management, psychology, range land resources, and wood science and technology. Students must take a number of baccalaureate core courses emphasizing writing, world cultures, the arts and sciences, literature, creative thinking, diversity, and global awareness.
Degree, PG Degree, and other Programs
It awards graduate degrees in more than 80 areas in the Colleges of Health and Human Sciences, Agricultural Sciences, Liberal Arts, Science, Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Engineering, Business, Forestry, Pharmacy, Political Science, and Veterinary Medicine. The College of Education includes Counselor Education. There are a few interdisciplinary programs. It also awards other professional degrees, including DVM and the D. Pharm.
Post baccalaureate and non-degree programs also exist. It has more than 200 academic programs. Undergraduates have the opportunity to perform real research within their respective field. The University is also home to a reputable Honors College with more than 300 student enrolled. Its students have the opportunity to participate in features like internship programs etc.
Testimonials
Corvallis literally means “heart of the valley,” which is exactly what this town is. Biz Demographics has listed Corvallis as the seventh city in the nation for great places to conduct business. The National Arbor Day Foundation awarded Corvallis the “ Top Tree City ” award in 2002. In addition, the Orange County Register picked Corvallis as the Pac-10 Conference's best campus in 2002.
It is recognized as one of the 73 operating Land Grants University of the World. It also is recognized as sea-grant, space-grant, and sun-grant. Amongst the several state universities , it is the only public university and one of the only two overall universities in the world to manage all the four grants.
According to a 2007 study of the top 500 universities of the world, this university was ranked higher than any other university in Oregon . It features in top 70 American universities while worldwide, the school is ranked in top 150 universities. It also features in top 50 universities of the US according to magazine STACK. It is ranked 29 th in the same list. It is also recognized as a University with very high research activity.
Components of the University
It was found in 1856 when Corvallis Academy was founded. In 1858, name was change to Corvallis College on the orders of Freemasons. October 27, 1868 is known as OSU Charter Day.
The Colleges of Agricultural Sciences, Business, Education, Engineering, Forestry, Health & Human Sciences, Liberal Arts, Oceanic & Atmospheric Sciences, Pharmacy, Science, and Veterinary Medicine are the various colleges that form the university.
It awards Bachelor's degrees in a number of different disciplines, including Agriculture studies, American studies, botany, computer science, environmental engineering, forest engineering, horticulture, liberal studies, merchandising management, nutrition and food management, psychology, range land resources, and wood science and technology. Students must take a number of baccalaureate core courses emphasizing writing, world cultures, the arts and sciences, literature, creative thinking, diversity, and global awareness.
Degree, PG Degree, and other Programs
It awards graduate degrees in more than 80 areas in the Colleges of Health and Human Sciences, Agricultural Sciences, Liberal Arts, Science, Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Engineering, Business, Forestry, Pharmacy, Political Science, and Veterinary Medicine. The College of Education includes Counselor Education. There are a few interdisciplinary programs. It also awards other professional degrees, including DVM and the D. Pharm.
Post baccalaureate and non-degree programs also exist. It has more than 200 academic programs. Undergraduates have the opportunity to perform real research within their respective field. The University is also home to a reputable Honors College with more than 300 student enrolled. Its students have the opportunity to participate in features like internship programs etc.
Testimonials
Corvallis literally means “heart of the valley,” which is exactly what this town is. Biz Demographics has listed Corvallis as the seventh city in the nation for great places to conduct business. The National Arbor Day Foundation awarded Corvallis the “ Top Tree City ” award in 2002. In addition, the Orange County Register picked Corvallis as the Pac-10 Conference's best campus in 2002.
Monday, April 4, 2011
Spirit House | CJNY National Conference
To get the latest juvenile justice news: follow CJNY at www.facebook.com Or on Twitter: twitter.com Our member group SpiritHouse Inc, is a Durham, North Carolina based cultural organizing collective, that has worked with community members to uncover and uproot the systemic barriers that prevent us from gaining the resources, leverage and capacity for long-term self-sufficiency. www.spirithouse-nc.org SpiritHouse is one of 143 member organizations that make up the Community Justice Network for Youth (CJNY). As a support network, the CJNY enhances the capacity of community organizations who collectively share one vision: To Stop the Rail to Jail! CJNY develops and nurtures real solutions to replace the "cradle to prison pipeline" created by zero-tolerance policies in schools, a lack of opportunities in poor communities and the failure of a variety of public systems. It is a unique combination of direct service providers, court and policy advocates and youth and community organizers who work to promote effective and culturally-appropriate community-based interventions and alternatives to detention and incarceration. By providing national leadership that engages its members, CJNY helps them demand their local justice systems be fair and accountable and that their education and mental health systems be culturally competent and restorative. It also helps to facilitate, support and expand local, state, regional and national peer-to-peer exchanges of best practices. CJNY staff ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8Lv6ryQSC4&hl=en
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8Lv6ryQSC4&hl=en
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)